On 4/20/06, Doug Kearns <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Is there any reason not to include the FAQ in this release?
It's not in "published" form and it's not complete (doesn't talk about
omni completion, for instance). It's a good idea to include it in the
release, though, with a clear caveat to the user that it's raw
information, not polished.
For example, it has "*** TOC ***" or something, and all the headings
have a prefix of -X. It's intended to process this information to
generate heading numbers and a table of contents.
Doug Kearns wrote:
> Are there any strange Ruby version requirements to run the omni
> completion script? Is any 1.8.x OK?
I'm gona say yes to that, as I've not tried it with anything but 1.8.x