On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:45:56PM +1000, Doug Kearns wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:28:36PM +0100, Hugh Sasse wrote:
> > Is the CVS considered stable now?
> Yes. I think so. Do you not use the latest CVS?
> > I ask because I have just updated
> > vim on one machine by some 40 patches, and considering the next step
> > notice that
> > http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=16 > > displays files some 7 months old (2004-09-20).
> Yes, we really should release more often. Just as long as Gavin is
> responsible for organising it. ;-)