I was just going to add some missing 1.9 syntax items and was curious
if anyone had strong feelings, either way, regarding configurable 1.9
Also opposed. Configurable 1.9 support might make sense if people only used 1.8 or 1.9 exclusively, which I imagine is pretty uncommon in this transition period.
I'm also curious what's missing. I know there are issues when 1.9 style symbol hash keys are reserved words (had to revert my own fix for that due to side effects). Perhaps -> should be highlighted (but what group?). Those are the only omissions I've noticed, speaking as someone who's spent the last month working in 1.9.