Hi list.
I tested this code on vim73. :echo "\<Plug>" =~# "\<Plug>" => 0 Is this right behavior? My :version is: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 BETA (2010 May 15, compiled Jun 10 2010 18:03:10) Compiled by tyru@tyru-linux Huge version with GTK2 GUI. Features included (+) or not (-): +arabic +autocmd +balloon_eval +browse ++builtin_terms +byte_offset +cindent +clientserver +clipboard +cmdline_compl +cmdline_hist +cmdline_info +comments +conceal +cryptv +cscope +cursorbind +cursorshape +dialog_con_gui +diff +digraphs +dnd -ebcdic +emacs_tags +eval +ex_extra +extra_search +farsi +file_in_path +find_in_path +float +folding -footer +fork() +gettext -hangul_input +iconv +insert_expand +jumplist +keymap +langmap +libcall +linebreak +lispindent +listcmds +localmap +menu +mksession +modify_fname +mouse +mouseshape +mouse_dec +mouse_gpm -mouse_jsbterm +mouse_netterm -mouse_sysmouse +mouse_xterm +multi_byte +multi_lang -mzscheme +netbeans_intg - osfiletype +path_extra +perl +persistent_undo +postscript +printer +profile +python +quickfix +reltime +rightleft +ruby +scrollbind +signs +smartindent -sniff +startuptime +statusline -sun_workshop +syntax +tag_binary +tag_old_static -tag_any_white -tcl +terminfo +termresponse +textobjects +title +toolbar +user_commands +vertsplit +virtualedit +visual +visualextra +viminfo +vreplace +wildignore +wildmenu +windows +writebackup +X11 -xfontset +xim +xsmp_interact +xterm_clipboard -xterm_save system vimrc file: "$VIM/vimrc" user vimrc file: "$HOME/.vimrc" user exrc file: "$HOME/.exrc" system gvimrc file: "$VIM/gvimrc" user gvimrc file: "$HOME/.gvimrc" system menu file: "$VIMRUNTIME/menu.vim" fall-back for $VIM: "/home/tyru/local/vim/share/vim" Compilation: gcc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFEAT_GUI_GTK - D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/ include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/ include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/directfb -I/ usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/ include -g -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE - DDEBIAN -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE - D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/lib/perl/5.10/CORE -I/usr/include/ python2.6 -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux -DRUBY_VERSION=18 -pthread Linking: gcc -L. -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -rdynamic -Wl,-export- dynamic -Wl,-E -L/usr/local/lib -o vim -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk- x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 - lgio-2.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 - lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lXt -lncurses -lselinux -lacl -lgpm -Wl,- E -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib/perl/5.10/CORE -lperl -L/usr/lib/ python2.6/config -lpython2.6 -lutil -Xlinker -export-dynamic -Wl,-O1 - Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -lruby1.8 -lrt -lm -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php |
Tyru Exe wrote: > Hi list. > > I tested this code on vim73. > :echo "\<Plug>" =~# "\<Plug>" => 0 > > Is this right behavior? Yes, using "\<Plug>" as a regexp will give unpredictable behavior. It's not a valid pattern. -- Back up my hard drive? I can't find the reverse switch! /// Bram Moolenaar -- [hidden email] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php |
In reply to this post by tyru-2
Hi again tyru,
In case you didn't know / haven't found it yet, you can use the stridx() function instead: stridx("foo \<Plug> bar", "\<Plug>") >= 0 evaluates to true. - Peter Odding -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php |
In reply to this post by Bram Moolenaar
I see.
Thanks Bram, Peter. On Jul 11, 9:16 pm, Bram Moolenaar <[hidden email]> wrote: > Tyru Exe wrote: > > Hi list. > > > I tested this code on vim73. > > :echo "\<Plug>" =~# "\<Plug>" => 0 > > > Is this right behavior? > > Yes, using "\<Plug>" as a regexp will give unpredictable behavior. > It's not a valid pattern. > > -- > Back up my hard drive? I can't find the reverse switch! > > /// Bram Moolenaar -- [hidden email] --http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ > /// sponsor Vim, vote for features --http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/\\\ > \\\ download, build and distribute --http://www.A-A-P.org /// > \\\ help me help AIDS victims --http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |